distracted and then summarize for the unbelievers:
- the Pope can not speak in laudatory terms and hagiographic. Forbidden to say that often interferes a bit 'too much in Italian political affairs, and that sometimes he is wrong (as when the Vatican urged the mayor of Rome Walter Veltroni and broke it mistreats the deterioration of the city)
- also President Napolitano can not speak in laudatory terms and hagiographic. You can not say that some time would well not to sign legislation that subjects the Prime Minister Berlusconi and will do much better to send them back to the sender for the obligatory changes. You can not even say that while he was in Capri went to view the tragedy of waste in Naples. A tragedy that Italy is providing a bad image in the world.
- Prime Minister Berlusconi can say something (being a protagonist of Italian political life), but always in moderation. It's not nice to talk about his problems with the law and especially of his telephone conversations intercepted by the magistrates. Skip to antiberlusconiano sworn subversive and dangerous as those that speak of his miracles promised, at least for the time missed or just delayed.
- Fini of the President of the Chamber is not stately remember his past in the MSI and, for what concerns the present, it is not gentlemanly to recall the unpleasant spectacle of the photograph published by a weekly gossip which is rather sensitive to attention of his current girlfriend.
- of many MPs is not kind to recall the sentences in the first and second degree and even outright for criminal association, corruption, bribery.
- of many MPs is unseemly bring to public attention the state of their family, made up of first, second and third wives. Also made up of children First, second and third read. That would be right if their business after the House or the Senate of Parliament in question do not declare themselves devotees of the Church, the Pope, the Vatican and absolutely convinced of the principle of the family one and indivisible.
- of many MPs is just as objectionable (although the public complaint comes from one of them) point out that you make of reeds, perhaps a few pills and cocaine. Better, much better, expose and bring before a court reporters who ascertained the problem.
- is just as unseemly to speak of arrogance and insolence with which so many parliamentarians carry out their mandate full of favors, prebends homes bought at ridiculous prices, benefits, business lobbyists.
- is absolutely inelegant (as a female, and then present policy-protected) to talk about favors that some women may have obtained parliamentary by some of its extra-bright performance.
- best skirt the issue or give the slightest emphasis on the fact that authoritative spokesman could ask what time it is a viado stopped on the sidewalk waiting for customers or they can receive the ministry starlets for a brilliant career and family.
- But then a lot of disaster in this Italy of what ever you can speak to a light heart?
Main topic is left in pieces that can not put together a serious opposition bet. You can talk about all the distinctions that are, incidentally left the show the other day in Piazza Navona, one can speak of the role of comedy and politics, one can speak (but softly) collided in the undecided Veltroni and all the revived D'Alema, one can say (at the risk of being insulted) that at the moment the only parties that represent real people, what works, what does not come at the end of the month, one that relates to buy bread and pasta for the price increases, which would take a bit 'over morality in the country today are the League of Italy Bossi Values \u200b\u200bof Di Pietro. Everything else is boring politics. You can say this or is unseemly? We can say that we are more tired of a caste untouchable and unwatchable?
http://club.quotidianonet.ilsole24ore.com
0 comments:
Post a Comment